The Virginia General Assembly passed legislation in its 2026
to legalize the adult cannabis market beginning on July 1, 2027. The state
cannabis control board will begin to process retail cannabis licenses in
February 2027. According to state law localities like Goochland do not have the
power to prohibit this but can regulate it.
At a lightly attended community meeting held on November 5
Deputy County Administrator Sara Worley and Assistant County Attorney Alexandra
Spaulding presented proposed amendments to county ordinances regulating where
retail cannabis outlets can be located and associated land use. Questions and
comments followed the presentation.
Worley said that the proposed ordinances amend chapter 15 of
the Goochland code. They would add new marijuana related uses, establish
definitions for marijuana establishments, create specific operational
standards, add sign regulations, and indicate in which zoning districts these
uses are permitted. Zoning code changes must go through the planning commission,
perhaps at is January meeting and to the Board of Supervisors for a final vote.
Code amendments for civil and criminal penalties are expected to get a board vote
in January.
As written, the law uses the terms marijuana and hemp
interchangeably even though the concentration of the psychoactive component
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is different. Worley explained that marijuana
or cannabis “is any part of a cannabis plant growing or not. It is seeds,
resin, any compounds, extracts or derivatives containing cannabinoids. Explicitly
excluded are mature stocks, fiber seed oil cake, or federal and state regulated
industrial hemp.”
Hemp is a legal and chemical classification. It is cannabis but
not all cannabis is hemp. State law distinguishes between the two based on its concentration
of THC, which must be 0.0.3. or less and
how the product is packaged to be
considered hemp.
The proposed ordinance applies only to cannabis concentrations
higher than 0.0.3 said Worley. Proposed uses include marijuana cultivation, and
microbusiness on land zoned A-1 or A-2
with a conditional use permit (CUP). Type I processing facilities are allowed
in A-1, A-2, M-1 and M-2 with a CUP. Testing facilities are allowed in M-1 and
M-2 by right because they are like existing testing facilities, which are
currently allowed by right. Retail and dispensing are allowed in B-1 and B-3
zoning districts with a CUP.
Retail regulations prohibit drive-through, walk-up, or
vending machines. Outlets cannot be located near schools and have space limits
inside buildings.
Outdoor cultivation requires an opaque fence at least eight feet
high around the entire perimeter, controlled access gates, intrusion detection,
and unobscured video security surveillance. Indoor cultivation prohibits light spillage
and must include air scrubbing odor control, a noise limit of 55 DBA, waste
must be rendered unusable, and chemical
waste must meet hazardous waste regulations. One attendee contended that indoor
marijuana growing uses significant amounts of power and water.
Marijuana transporters must be licensed by the county.
Spalding explained that ordinance changes include civil and
criminal penalties.
A 3.5 percent tax rate is proposed. That money comes back to
the county and does not have to be allocated for any specific use.
There were questions about the definition of regulated hemp
in the proposed ordinance amendments.
Dr. Richard Carchman a
retired professor from the School of Medicine at MCV, VCU who is a
pharmacologist, toxicologist, and biostatistician asked why the proposed ordinances
do not address intoxication while operating a vehicle.
He said that “the states that have legalized recreational
marijuana have a spectrum of blood levels that are acceptable or not, including
0. None of these levels are associated with any degree of impairment. So, this
is a wonderful thing for lawyers, the defense lawyers. You're going to arrest
somebody with a blood level of so many picograms or nothing, and none of those
levels have anything to do with impairment. What the Dickens is in the mind of
these people?
“For medical marijuana, they usually start around 5% and go
up. A recent study out of Switzerland looking at depression found that 13% THC
was adequate over a year to reduce depression, 13% do you know what that does
to an individual outside of a hospital situation? I think somebody ought to be
somewhat concerned about that.”
He contended that state and federal taxes will be layered on
top the county’s 3.5 percent making low impact products very expensive. “. . imagine selling a
product that costs a lot of money based on the tax situation that doesn't give
the impact you want. This is a heyday for the Black market. We have a long
known history of the consequences of doing that for alcohol. We have a legal
limit set besides physical impairment. The Sheriff's Office has to have
deputies take a special course, which the County has to pay for to become
capable of identifying somebody who's under the influence while they're
driving. That's another cost that the County has to bear. I just see a
nightmare situation. So, all the excitement about excise taxes and what the
benefit to the schools is a myth. We're going to be paying through our noses at
all levels.
“Why anybody in their right mind who's looking to get a real
zap would go and spend a fortune on something that won't do anything, eludes
me, absolutely eludes me.”
Dillon’s Rule strike again.
Go to https://goochlandcova.portal.civicclerk.com/event/4566/media
to see the presentation.











