During the afternoon session of their August 4 meeting, Goochland supervisors congratulated the Goochland Department of Animal Care and Protection for earning a fourth consecutive no kill award from the Best Friends Animal Society, a national nonprofit dedicated to ending the killing of dogs and cats in America’s shelters. The No-Kill award is given annually to organizations that have achieved a save rate of 90% or higher.
Deputy County Administrator for Operations Elizabeth
McDonald said that the Goochland shelter achieved an outstanding 97 percent
survival rate. “This is no small accomplishment and reflects the commitment,
compassion, and professionalism our staff supported by volunteers and dedicated
veterinary partners.”
If you’re looking to add a furry friend to your family,
please visit the Goochland Animal Sheler. Go to https://www.goochlandva.us/299/Animal-Protection
to learn more. Also visit https://goochlandpetlovers.com/
the site of the local non-profit that works with the shelter.
During its evening session, the Board held a public hearing on
proposed animal code ordinance amendments. Job Greene, Director of Animal
Protection, explained that the amendments were proposed to restore legal
enforceability, decriminalize minor infractions, and maintain officer
discretion when dealing with animal control issues.
Greene explained that the revisions would make the ordonnances
work the way they were intended, in a clear, fair, and effective way while
preserving the department’s ability to educate and work with residents. The
ordinance revisions will give animal protection the tools it needs. Over the
years, Green explained, ordinances as written, are difficult to enforce, inconsistent
with the way that animal protection approaches compliance, or unnecessarily
challenging for officers and citizens.
The first three infractions are regulatory. They are failure
to inoculate dogs and cats against rabies; dogs running at large without a
license fixed to their collar; and failure to pay a license tax for dogs. The proposed
amendment revisions change the penalty for these infractions from a Class 4 misdemeanor,
which imposes fines, but not jail time and are noted on an individual’s criminal
record, to civil penalties with escalating fees for initial and subsequent
violations.
The revisions would improve compliance by resolving
violations quickly with civil citations; reduce demands on court and related law
enforcement resources; allow enforcement resources to focus on cases involving
cruelty, neglect, dangerous animals and other threats to public safety; provide
penalties proportionate to offenses while maintaining accountability; and preserve
criminal penalties for serious or repeat offense that warrant stronger enforcement.
Changes to chapter 3 of the animal ordinance states that “livestock,
poultry, and other fowl must remain on the property of owner. It is unlawful for
any person to allow or permit any livestock or fowl owned by him or her or
under the control of him or her to stray to any highway, public property, or private
premises of another.”
The proposed amended removes the requirement for three prior
violations and makes each violation separately enforceable. Greene said that animal
protection officers would continue to use discretion to issue warnings of
violation depending on the individual circumstances. The change would restore enforceability
of the ordinance while giving officers the flexibility to seek voluntary
compliance whenever possible. Virgina law does not authorize counties to impose
a civil penalty for this kind of violation, so explained Greene, retaining
criminal enforcement is necessary.
Greene said that officers typically give people time to
rectify a violation after issuing a warning before they return to ensure
compliance.
A local fourth generation farmer said that it is important to
him to own livestock and keep the community safe. He raised concerns about the timeline
as most farmers must have jobs that take them away from their farms, making it difficult
to immediately correct problems. He cited weather related conditions like destruction
of fences that could make it hard to return the animals to their rightful place.
Some farmers pasture livestock on widely separated parcels of land that make it
hard to check on all of their animals in a timely manner.
Another speaker wondered if it is a per penalty. Owners of animals
that damage other people’s property or cause accidents by being on a road must
be held accountable. Circumstances of how animals escape might also need to be considered
when determining culpability.
Greene said that an officer must see the animal out to
justify a summons. “This is for us an issue of people who do not keep their animals
contained, repeated negligence. We understand and make allowances for weather related
incidents.”
Enforcement is complaint driven to correct problems, like a
neighbor’s chickens repeatedly pooping on your porch, or someone else’s pig
eating your cucumbers. Cows and horses in the middle of a road are a safety concern,
but sometimes, they get out. Citations are given per incident, not per animal.
Greene said that currently animal control has no enforceable
code to bring offenders into compliance and that hobby farmers tend to cause
more problems than commercial farmers, who value and care for their livestock.
The supervisors took the concerns of the farmers to heart
and voted unanimously to reduce all noted penalties to civil violations and
encouraged animal control to have further discussions with local farmers, perhaps
through Goochland Farm Bureau, to look for other ways to address the matter.