The November 4 Board of Supervisors’ evening session had a
lengthy agenda. During the first hour of the meeting the board heard citizen
comment, mostly from opponents of data centers and the gun proposed range near
Hadensville, concluding with comic relief when a young man with a plastic
manikin performed a Tik Tok stunt.
Some board members commented after citizen comment was
closed. Jonathan Lyle, District 5, thanked those who spoke for their engagement
and sharing their viewpoints. He reiterated that the land use process is
dynamic with twists and turns and encouraged them to continue to share
information.
Board Vice Chair Neil Spoonhower, District 2, who presided
over the meeting in the absence of Chair Jonathan Christy, District 1, explained
that the Southern Infrastructure Study, done in 2024, was not a small area plan
designed to gather citizen input. But rather was done to gather data about a
specific area, formerly known as the Southern Prime Economic Development Area
(SPEDA), to identify existing infrastructure and that needed to support different
kinds of development. Data included in the final report (https://www.goochlandva.us/1280/Southeastern-Infrastructure-Study-SIS)
illustrated the impact of various kinds of development and improvements needed
to support it. The stud included at
least two well attended public meetings.
Spoonhower added his thanks to citizens for their great
comments and continued engagement. He also pointed out that the supervisors cannot
vote on an application that does not exist.
Most of the attendees departed before the public hearings
began.
R&R Remining and Reclamation
This was an application to renew conditional use permits
(CUP) for 678.628 acres on Shannon Hill Road in District 1 for mining
operations, on three one acre sites on the parcel. An additional parcel was
added to provide better access to Shannon Hill Road. The original CUPs were
granted in 2021. The renewals are for ten years. Gold was mined in this part of
Goochland until the 1930s.
The mining areas are regulated by the Virginia Department of
Energy, which prohibits the disposal of offsite materials, toxic chemicals, and
trash. No blasting is allowed on the property.
The applicant Paul Busch explained that gold mining from
1880 to 1930 used mercury—he said that
the federal government estimates that five tractor trailer loads of mercury
were used in eight gold mines near Shannon Hill Road. He said that his operation,
first approved in 2021, was a pilot program to see if minerals on the site could
be reclaimed and the land cleaned up profitably. Busch said that the process
became more economical when gold hit $5,000 an ounce. In addition to extracting
mercury, Busch is removing timbers coated
with creosote used to build the old mine shafts that contaminated ground water.
The board unanimously approved the applications.
KRLB Real Estate Holdings of Rockville, LLC
An application to rezone 17.969 acres on Ashland Road
approximately 1,000 feet west of Johnson Road in the northeast part of the
county from A-2 to M-2 with proffered conditions, amended to add screening for
outdoor storage along Ashland Road, was unanimously approved. The property is
in the Rockville Opportunity Corridor, where other heavy industrial uses, including
an asphalt plant that has been in operation for decades, are located. The
application included two possible development scenarios for the site. One a
single story warehouse, the other a six-lot option with outside by-right storage
for things like heavy equipment and landscaping businesses.
Heavy industrial uses, including data centers, adult
businesses, and asphalt and cement mixing, were proffered out, meaning that they
are prohibited. Building turn lanes to
access the property was also proffered. The application was unanimously
approved.
GCJ Holdings, LLC
An application to renew a CUP for a campground and place of
public assembly on 55.31 acres at 1978 Cardwell Road in District 3 was approved
and renewed for 10 years.
Serenity Trail, LLC
This application asked to rezone109.23 acres on Maidens Road
just south of Poorhouse Road from A-2 to
Residential Rural R-R for, a no more than nine lot subdivision, filed by
Wonderview LLC. An earlier attempt to rezone this property for 24 lots was
rejected due to concerns about traffic on a narrow, winding road, and the impact
of its wells on the water table.
This time around, the applicant proposed fewer, larger lots,
significant open space, and restrictions on the amount of land that can be
cleared for buildings, wells, and septic systems. A proffer to restrict the
pump rate for wells to a maximum rate of 25 gallons per minute, and require
deep, drilled wells was included. The applicant said that the existing view
shed along Maidens Road will be protected and contended that the project is an
example of how low rural impact development should be executed in Goochland. The
larger lots, the applicant contended, lend themselves to equestrian uses.
A hydrogeologic study of the property performed by X Mid
Atlantic indicated that the project’s wells will have negligible impact on the area’s
water table. This kind of study should be mandatory for all subdivisions using
private wells anywhere in the county.
The project will build a turn lane, which did little to
assuage concerns about safety on a road so narrow that vehicles must execute a
version of a porcupine mating dance to pass. The application was approved 3-1
with Spoonhower, who tends to oppose residential rezoning outside the
designated growth areas, in dissent.
Main Street Homes of Virginia
This application, which asked to rezone, for no more than 38
homes, a 123.88 parcel on the east side of Manakin Road just west of Tuckahoe
Bridge is a whittled down version of an earlier proposal with higher density that
became unviable when extension of the Tuckahoe Creek Service District outside
the ordinance footprint was denied.
In her staff presentation of the application, Assistant
Director of Planning Kerry Ragland described the property as currently open
fields and some wooded areas used mainly for farming. It is a family homestead
dating circa 1750, its buildings dilapidated, torn down, and abandoned. Lots
would be about two acres, with 29
percent open space, mostly surrounded by
trees at the rear of the property.
Proffers include creation of a HOA, which will be
responsible for maintaining the open space common areas and an existing cemetery on the
property.
There will be a turn lane from Manakin Road to the project.
Additional access will be via connection with Tuckahoe Bridge through a VDOT
mandated stub road. Homes will be served by private well and septic systems. At
least two fire hydrants connected to the TCSD will be installed, rather than a
cistern, for fire protection. The application did not include a hydrogeologic
report on the impact of 38 new wells on the water table, or existing wells in
the area.
Opponents argued that the proposal, located in a rural enhancement
area, did not follow the comprehensive land use plan and enabled “urban sprawl”
into farmland, which erodes the rural character of the area.
The broker for the landowner said that her clients are
retired and want to benefit from the
growth occurring around them. They believe that the highest and best use of
their land is a single family subdivision. She contended that the density of
the proposed project is half of that in
Tuckahoe Bridge and similar to that of the Wheatlands, Ford’s, and Nuckols Forest subdivisions,
further west on Manakin Road that have been there for years.
The applicant contended that the reduced density of the project
is an appropriate step down to rural enhancement.
Supervisors commended opponents of the project for their well
thought out presentations, but cited road improvements for the project, lower
density than Tuckahoe Bridge, and contentions that it is the highest and best
use of the land as reasons for approval. Tom Winfree, District 3, said that the
county needs homes for Eli Lilly employees coming to the county.
Jonathan Lyle, District 5 said he wants to see population
growth in the county slow, and remains concerned about cumulative impact on public
safety. He said that the property is a charter farm that is going to leave agriculture, and that
is the landowner’s decision. “I also don't think it's up to us to guarantee
that they get a certain return on that property if we allow increased density
that is not in compliance with the Comp plan to allow them to get more money
for their land. It's an inherited investment, but no investment is guaranteed a
return.” Lyle cast the lone dissenting vote.
Let’s hope that Main Street Homes does a better job respecting
the Manakin Road neighbors during build out than it did during construction of Songbird.












