A presentation of updates to the proposed 2040 Goochland
County Major Thoroughfare Plan (MTP) resulting from community input at a March
meeting, was the perfect antidote to television
reruns on the sultry evening of August 9.
The updated proposed plan (see http://goochlandva.us/DocumentCenter/View/4766/Community-Meeting-Presentation-8-9-18
for details) was pared down and changed from the current MTP, approved in 2005.
Gone are plans to four lane Rt. 250 from the Henrico to Fluvanna borders and
widening of Hockett Road in the east end.
Instead, the proposed MTP includes adding another lane to
Fairground Road and allegedly making two lane roads like Rockville and Hadensville-Fife
safer by increasing their rights-of-way to accommodate wider shoulders. It also
includes the connector bridge between Tuckahoe Creek Parkway and Ridgefield
Parkway in Henrico.
A connector between Hockett and Ashland Road, south of Broad
Street Road that was removed from an access management plan adopted a few years
ago, has reappeared. Residents of Hickory Haven and business owners on the north
end of Hockett Road who objected to this, need to review the proposed MTP and contact
their supervisor with comments. The Board will hold a workshop on the matter on
August 29. Public hearings will be held before the planning commission and supervisors
later this year before anything is adopted.
The Board meeting room was full of citizens fired up about
rush hour traffic on River Road West and in the Hockett/Manakin Roads corridor
on August 9.
Todd Kilduff, Deputy County Administrator for Community and
Economic Development, explained that the MTP is a conceptual plan, part of the county’s comprehensive land use plan, that helps guide
land use decisions. It does NOT include a detailed map or exact location for any
proposed roads, but rather indicates the general location of traffic problems
and suggests possible mitigation strategies.
Carl Tewksbury, a traffic engineer with Kimley-Horn and
Associates, the consulting firm retained by the county to update the MTP, reiterated
that the MTP is just lines on a map. It takes a long time to plan for and build
roads, which are expensive and not getting any cheaper. Goochland County Administrator
John Budesky explained that it takes about five years for a road project to be
added to the VDOT secondary six year road plan. If the stars align and money is
available, the road might then get built, which is itself a multi-year project.
Bulldozers are not revving their engines to start building the conceptual roads
shown on the 2040 MTP.
In March, owners of property—much of it landlocked—south of
Tuckahoe Creek Parkway between West Creek and Hockett Road (we’ll call them the
southern land owners, SLO for short), sent letters to residents of the south
end of Hockett Road implying that the county would soon condemn part of their
front yards for road widening if the HHHunt
proposal was approved. Those residents came to the March meeting angrily
demanding that the county not widen the road as proposed in the 2005 MTP.
That lengthy session yielded
a list of transportation—read “road”—improvement
priorities that Kimley-Horn incorporated into the proposed MTP. The supervisors heeded the wishes of citizens
and removed expansion of the south end of Hockett Road from the proposed MTP.
Fast forward to the August meeting. A new north-south
connector road to ease the traffic problem
on Hockett was included to the proposed MTP, generally, intersecting with River
Road West in the vicinity of the Richmond County Club.
This time, the SLO riled up residents who live near the
Richmond Country Club about the “new road” passing next to their homes.
The RCC area people were furious and ignored comments by
both Kilduff and Tewksbury that no specific location for this road has been
designated. They also did not seem to understand that no roads in this area
will be built any time soon. Indeed, relatively minor improvements to the Broad
Street Road/Rt. 288 interchange, which were approved and funded a few years
ago, will not be complete until late 2020. The time frame for brand new roads
is much longer and, depending on future growth, might never be built.
The SLO, who just happened to have their own alternate route,
contended that their connector roads, whose rights of way would be donated to
the county and hinted that they might help fund construction, generated
standing support from the Cobblestone folks, who should have known better.
The SLO alternate route connects with westbound West Creek
Parkway just west of its intersection with Rt. 288 (sorry about all the wests).
It gives no indication where the traffic is headed after reaching West Creek
Parkway. How traffic headed for southbound Rt. 288 will reach its destination is
not addressed. This is probably not a good place for roundabout or traffic light. Congestion that
now clogs Hockett Road at rush hour would just be moved and perhaps back up
even more.
New roads through the undeveloped parcels just north of
River Road West will bring their own set of traffic problems. The value of land
owned by the SLO will increase when it has road access. These landowners will undoubtedly
develop this land to its “highest and best use” as the real estate folks say,
and there is nothing wrong with that.
Whatever is built there will generate traffic. We do not
know what that development will look like. The current comprehensive plan
suggests unspecified “commercial “with no retail. That could change. Residential
use seems to be in favor between West Creek and Hockett Road, so homes ranging
from upscale estates like Rivergate, or dense high-rise affordable housing
might be built there. Alternatively, commercial uses on those parcels could
include warehouses to move cargo from the giant container ships that will soon
dock in Tidewater, office buildings, or other enterprises. However that land
develops, it will generate traffic. It may also be clear cut to accommodate new
uses.
Most of the discussion centered on rush hour congestion in
the Hockett Road/River Road West area caused by employees from Capital One and CarMax
homebound south of the James River
seeking to avoid “parking lot” conditions on Rt. 288 is likely.
The 800 pound elephant in the room, Rt. 288, was hardly
mentioned.
Kilduff explained that, since Rt. 288 is VDOT territory, it
is not addressed in Goochland’s MTP. Coincidently, the current MTP was approved
in 2005, approximately the same time that Rt. 288 connected Interstates 64 and
95. When Rt, 288 was opened, VDOT predicted that it would take at least 20
years for the new road to reach its capacity. In reality, it was soon clogged
at rush hour. Kilduff also said that VDOT is investigating methods to increase
the capacity of Rt. 288 by using its shoulders as traffic lanes. There was no
mention of how this would work on the James River bridge.
The 2040 MTP is not a magic bullet to eliminate traffic and ease
congestion. It does provide a game plan, subject to change, to prioritize transportation
projects.
Please take a look at the proposed MTP and provide feedback
to your supervisor or county administration.