The county budget process is never-ending. The
supervisors adopt a county-wide budget for the next fiscal year in April and approve
tax rates for the calendar year. Budgets are best estimates of expenditures and assumptions
that conditions will not change during the fiscal year. Accurate prediction is
an oxymoron, but the goal is to get as close to a moving target as possible.
Goochland is a relatively small county, but its budget is still
complicated. (To see the FY 2020 budget on the county website go to http://www.goochlandva.us/
and click on the budget and capital improvement program on the left.) It is
comprised of an operating budget and a capital improvement plan.
On Wednesday, January 22, the supervisors and school board
held a joint work session focused on the capital improvement plan. There were
five new faces at the table, three new school board members: Sandra
Barefoot-Reid, District 1; William Quarles, Jr. District 2, and Mike Newman, District
4; and two new supervisors, Neil Spoonhower, District 2 and Don Sharpe,
District 4.
New boards discuss CIP |
County Administrator John Budesky began the session with
background information. The capital improvement plan, he explained, is a
strategy to fund items with a useful life of generally more than five years
whose cost typically exceeds $50k.
While the school division adopts its own CIP, said Budesky,
the supervisors are charged with balancing the collective needs with available revenue,
and debt capacity based on the real estate tax rate, which is currently 53
cents per $100 of assessed valuation.
He explained that that, two years ago, using growth projections,
the county and schools developed a 25
year CIP—something unheard of most jurisdictions look out only five years—that
included schools, fire-rescue stations, a courthouse, and major improvements to
existing facilities like cyclical replacement of HVAC and computer systems. This revealed, to no one’s surprise, that the
county’s cliff of needs” was falling behind the five-year CIP.
“This is a plan. Things change, priorities can be different,”
said Budesky. Some of the amounts are placeholders, not locked in stone, to
plan long term. Some projects can be moved forward into the five-year window,
some must be pushed out. This helps to address the impact of new “rooftops” on
county services. “My hope is that we can have a robust decision to set in
motion criticality on this for the next five years.”
Right now, there are significant challenges. For instance,
our three elementary schools were built 50 years ago and need replacing. Going
forward, Budesky, the county tries to “smooth “out major funding challenges by
not buying everything at once.
The county said Budesky is cautious about incurring debt and
pays cash whenever possible. “We do a great job of cash funding our ongoing
needs.” Going forward however, greater needs make that difficult if not impossible.
The CIP is the recommendation of the staffs of the county and school division.
Both boards set policy. There will be lots of discussion about the CIP and operating
budgets in the coming months.
Budesky contended that the county’s ability to deliver major
construction projects successfully to the community, even if money is no issue,
must be considered. Project management, including procurement process, and project
oversight should not be underestimated as part of a capital improvement plan.
On February 18, Budesky will present his recommended budget
for FY21, which will include changes from the FY20 five-year CIP. He said that
there needs to be a robust discussion about important projects not included in
the five-year CIP window and what steps may be necessary to address them.
A new Goochland Elementary School and a new circuit court
house are at the top of the facilities list. Details will be forth coming and
available online in a few weeks, including the justification for the priority.
Construction of a new courthouse, estimated to cost in the
range of $25 million, has been pushed beyond the five-year plan. Budesky
suggested that a phased approach to replace the courthouse could move the
project forward with a “more digestible” funding schedule.
Public safety needs are the top priority on the county side,
said Budesky. A new $1.4 million ladder truck for the eastern end of the county
has been moved into FY21 while the West Creek public safety facility has been
pushed out beyond FY25. Manakin Company 1
can accommodate the new ladder truck, and existing stations can be “upstaffed” to
provide additional service in the rapidly growing east end, contended Budesky.
A new ladder truck to complement Ladder 5 (pictured) is part of FY21 CIP. |
Fire-Rescue Chief D. E. “Eddie” Ferguson, Jr., said that his
agency has been successful obtaining grant funds to replace ambulances, which have
quarter million-dollar price tags, but competition for that money is robust.
The average mileage for Goochland ambulances is 122,000. Currently, three ambulances
are “in the shop” for maintenance. Ferguson reported that a grant application
for devices to remove diesel exhaust, a known carcinogen, from fire-rescue stations
was not successful.
Budesky said that conservative budgeting practices have
served the county well, but things could change if the economy dips. A slide of
debt illustrated pay down of current debt before incurring new debt, which keeps
indebtedness relatively stable. The “red line” on the chart is the goal.
Chart of county debt. The goal is not to exceed to red line. |
The new Goochland Elementary School is the highest priority,
said Budesky. Changes in the construction market will increase costs. Last year
the new GES, with an increased capacity of 650, was estimated to cost north of
$36 million and its accompanying road projects more than $4 million. Since last
year, that projection increased to approximately $6 million.
The new GES will be built on this site on Bulldog Way. |
School Superintendent Jeremy Raley said he is thankful for
the county’s transparent collaborative approach to the budget process. The new
GES is the focus of the school division and a legacy project for the
community. Other projects related to the
ongoing needs of the school division, “including those yellow school buses that
transport precious cargo,” also need funding. These are high dollar “ordinary”
costs for roof, HVAC systems and other items to create a safe and comfortable
learning environment.
Raley said that the secondary complex has become the
entertainment and cultural hub of the county. GHS was built in 2001 and needs interior
renovation, roof, and system upgrades.
John Lumpkins, Jr. , District 3 cautioned against over
building schools and asked about school enrollment, Raley said that there has
been a modest drop in enrollment but contended that the new GES would extend
the life of BES and RES to the point where the county can afford to build new
schools.
“We want to have a quality project that gives citizens value
for their tax dollars being mindful that we are stewards of county money,” said
Raley.
Budesky said that there will be “a lot more rolling up of
the sleeves” before the budget is finished. “There is room for modification up
to its approval.” He thanked Barbara Horlacher and Debbie White, finance directors
for the county and schools respectively, for their efforts in preparing the
information.
School Board Chairperson John Wright, District 5 said he
would like the supervisors to review the schools’ CIP, which was approved last
November, to see what items were eliminated. “This process is meant to be
inclusive of everybody here,” said Wright.
The five year CIP of the school division includes $20 million for an addition to GHS, renovations
to GMS and routine costs including replacement of school buses (go to school board CIP November 2.)
Chatter about the need to raise the tax rate to fund
services and facilities as Goochland grows has been around for a while. It is
doubtful that the FY21 budget will include an increase in the tax rate, but
next year is another matter. “There need to be conversations about needs beyond
the five-year plan that cannot be funded with the current 53 cents per $100 of
valuation tax rate” said Budesky.
The county is expected to use its excellent bond ratings to
borrow a substantial amount of money in the next few years. Just how much the county
will borrow and what sort of tax rate will service that debt remains to be
seen.
Let’s hope that the constructive collaboration between the supervisors
and school board continues as they seek to meet Goochland’s financial
challenges.