Goochland supervisors had a full plate of public hearings at their September 3 meeting. Some have already been explored by GOMM, others need to be mentioned.
On another note. Early voting began on September 20. Go to https://www.goochlandva.us/359/Elections-and-Voter-Registration
for details.
FEMA floodplain
The supervisors unanimously approved an ordinance amendment
that repealed existing FEMA floodplain maps and replaced them with updated
provisions and adopted and incorporated new flood insurance rate maps issued by
FEMA.
Deputy County Administrator Josh Gillespie explained that
adoption of the ordinance amendment will allow the county’s continued
participation in the FEMA national flood insurance program. This allows
Goochlanders access to federally backed floor insurance and provides better
data to use when making development decisions. The new maps, said Gillespie, are
increasingly precise and accurate, especially in the flood insurance rate map
updates. Goochland has participated in the program since 1979.
Go to https://www.goochlandva.us/1244/Preliminary-FEMA-Floodplain
for details.
These updates, said Gillespie, are the first since 2008.
Community outreach was held earlier this year as well as coordination with the state
department of conservation and recreation to gather input on proposed changes.
The final map updates added and removed some areas. Gillespie pointed out that a rezoning
application approved earlier this year, for land near the intersection of Broad
Street Road and the southbound Rt. 288 ramp, referenced the flood plain
changes. The new ordinance will take effect on October 10th to align
with the county’s participation in the flood plain insurance program renewal.
District 5 Supervisor Jonathan Lyle questioned the
methodology used to contact those impacted by the new map. He said that Mosaic residents
were not aware of the pending changes, speculating that the notification went to
the developer, not individual homeowners. This failure to notify those who will
be affected by pending land use changes, pointed out Lyle, has been an ongoing
issue, especially for homes under construction, whose owner of record is the
builder or developer, not the ultimate homeowner, who may remain unaware of
proposed changes before they become permanent .
Minimum tax assessment adjustment
The supervisors voted unanimously to amend Chapter 13 of the
Goochland County code, 1A, Section 13-10.10 to increase the minimum tax
assessment and Appendix C of the county code to raise to $50k the floor for
payment of gross receipts tax and eliminate the business license fee for businesses
with gross receipts of up to $50k. It also created a flat rate fee for
contractors with gross receipts of up to $25k. This will provide some relief
for small business.
District 2 supervisor Neil Spoonhower, who has been on the
board since 2020, said that during his tenure as a supervisor some sort of tax
relief for seniors, veterans, farm equipment, or the “big lift” last year to
lower the personal property tax rate of vehicles was approved every year. “I’m
proud that we are being fiscally conservative and trying to keep money in our
citizens’ pocket because they’re a much better spender of it than we are.”
Board Chair Charlie Vaughters District 4, echoed
Spoonhower’s sentiment. “For those who have not had the opportunity to go to
the farmers markets or our stores with numerous vendors who are a major part of
our small businesses. WE should do everything we can to foster than in our community.
It’s great to see a full spectrum of businesses in a place where they can
thrive. We are not just looking out for the big guys; we’re looking out for
everyone across the spectrum.”
Floor area ratio
Zoning ordinance amendments tend to be viewed by many citizens
as eye rolling “inside baseball” not worthy of their attention until unintended
consequences become apparent.
Floor area ratio (FAR)—determined by dividing the gross
floor area of a structure by the area of a lot—got attention earlier this year in
connection to a commercial development on Pouncey Tract Road. That resulted in
a fairly narrow ordinance amendment for projects that are part of a master plan.
After a good bit of discussion on the matter, the
supervisors referred a proposal to eliminate FAR requirements to the planning
commission, which recommended approval. The board voted 4-1 to follow suit and
remove FAR from county code.
Gillespie referenced robust citizen objection to the removal
of FAR from zoning regulations, including that larger buildings will increase
intensity of development and the service burden on fire-rescue, allow structures
that degrade the county’s rural character, and is an effective tool to manage
growth.
They also deflected the notion that FAR is a deterrent to
economic development and raised concerns about the unintended consequences of
removing FAR for all commercial districts that could attract substandard high-density
development. FAR not apply to residential. Apartments are considered commercial
use.
Supporters of FAR’s removal cited its negative impact on the
county’s ability to attract new business and that there are many other “tools
in the zoning toolbox” to achieve the same goals, that FAR is redundant. These regulations
include setbacks, adherence to the statewide fire prevention code, stormwater
management and parking requirements.
The FAR matter discussion seemed designed to make the county
able to attract data centers and related development.
Ben Slone, Chair of the Goochland Economic Development
Authority said that discussions with economic development prospects are highly
confidential, governed by non-disclosure agreement and will never happen with
FAR restrictions in place.
Lyle said that he, like his fellow supervisors, is equally
enthused about economic development and growth in an intelligent, managed way.
However, he was not ready to discard FAR and cast the sole dissenting vote against
elimination. He would prefer the creation of data center overlay districts in places
deemed appropriate for them. He also contended that he was unaware of any
development prospect that the county lost due to having FAR on the books.
Other supervisors contended that lightening the hand of regulation
is a good thing and that the county needs robust economic development to fund
the services that citizens demand while keeping the residential real estate tax
level.
Vaughters said that the supervisors were elected to make
hard decisions and have fiduciary duties to citizens and economic development
prospects. “Generating economic development is not a simple, binary process,” said
Vaughters. “What should we turn somebody away because we are overregulating on
the front end... The worst situation we could be in looking ten years down the
road and wondering why we don’t have enough business. We need to be ahead of the
game, be forward thinking and be friendly to businesses who want to come to
Goochland.”
We’re all concerned about growth oozing westward on Broad
Street. The mess opposite Aldi, whose only open and green space between townhomes
and commercial development seems to be narrow strips of sod and a few trees
among parking spaces, could be what no FAR looks like in a mixed-use
development.