After a busy winter filled with challenge and change, the
Goochland supervisors tended to routine matters on May 1.
The first order of business was a special meeting to swear in
John Lumpkins, Jr., appointed last month the fill the District 3 supervisor
seat left vacant by the passing of Ned Creasey until a special election is held
on November 6. The Hon. Dale W. Agnew,
Clerk of the Goochland Circuit Court administered the oath of office.
The Hon. Dale W. Agnew administers oath of office to John Lumpkins, Jr, |
Board Chair Ken Peterson, District 3 said that Lumpkins, who
vacated his seat as District 3 representative and chair of the Goochland School
Board to become a supervisor, is “no stranger to the team.” Peterson referred
to the slate of candidates who first ran for office in 2011 replacing the entire
school board and four supervisors. Running together, these people got to know
each other well and continued that positive collaboration once office.
Lumpkins said it was an honor to serve on the school board
and work closely with Ned Creasey, who encouraged him.
Lumpkins, a graduate of the University of Dayton and the
University of Richmond’s T. C. Williams
College of Law, is an attorney in private practice. All of his children are GHS
graduates and a daughter is an EMS volunteer with Courthouse Company 5.
During the afternoon session, the supervisors adopted amended
financial management policies as recommended by the audit committee, which met
earlier in the day.
As the Commonwealth
of Virginia imposes no statutory limitation on the amount of debt a county can
issue, these policies will be crucial when Goochland issues debt for major capital
projects including a circuit court house, schools, and fire-rescue stations in the
next few years. Adopting guidelines that include simple formulas to keep
Goochland from “getting in over its head” is a wise and prudent course of
action.
Revised provisions include:
The ratio of debt service expenditures as a percent of total
general fund expenditures, including transfers to other funds, shall have a
target of 10 percent with a ceiling of 12 percent.
Net debt as a
percentage of the taxable assessed value of real estate is not to exceed two
and one half percent. Projects such as the Virginia Resources Authority obligation for the Tuckahoe Creek Service
District, which is supported by a dedicated revenue stream—ad valorem tax and
revenue sharing—or other self-supporting obligations, will not be included. To the extent that the County
provides general fund support, the proportionate share of the debt that the
County is supporting will be included in this ratio.
A revenue stabilization reserve, essentially a rainy day
fund, equal to three percent of the total annual adopted general fund budget of
the subsequent fiscal year plus the non-local school operating budget will be
maintained. This can be used if general
fund revenues, excluding use of prior year fund balance, decline by more than
1.5 percent or during the annual budget cycle real estate assessments are
forecast to decrease more than three percent from the previous year.
Withdrawals may not exceed half of the balance in reserve in
any one fiscal year and shall be used in combination with spending cuts. In the
event of a draw down, the reserve must be replenished to the three percent
level in three fiscal years.
Peterson pronounced the revised policies an elegant solution
to even out county finances through economic rough spots and adhere to best fiscal
management practices. Having this policy
in place also helps to maintain the county’s AAA bond rating by demonstrating
that Goochland is able to negotiate an economic downturn.
Third quarter General Fund projections—the fiscal year ends
on June 30—shows revenues exceed
expenditures by $4.9 million.
County Administrator John Budesky reported that he attended
a Goochland Pet Lovers event the at the Hardywood Park Craft Brewery in West
Creek on April 29 where GPL presented the county with a check for $250,000
toward the new animal shelter.
VDOT representative Marshall Wynn said that the parts of Manakin Road torn up by
gas line installation will be repaved. He also expressed optimism that the
improvements at the intersection of Broad Street Road and Rt. 288 may be
accelerated. He expects work on the West Creek Parkway/ Rt. 6 interchange to
begin in the fall.
Paul Drumwright, Administrative Services Manager presented
an overview of the 2018 Virginia General Assembly session.
No bills dealing with transportation of sludge (biosolids)
were filed.
A bill allowing a change to the number of members on the
county Economic Development Authority was patroned by Lee Ware, 65th
District, and passed. It will go into effect on July 1.
There may be more money in the state budget—if one ever gets
passed—for Broadband expansion.
No legislation dealing with reimbursement of cost of electoral
boards registrars, or partisan primaries got traction.
Thanks to 56th District Del. John McGuire, the
Goochland Drive-In will be included on Interstate signage.
Bills introduced dealing with proffer policies were addressed
at a “proffer party” on April 17. Drumwright said that legislators strongly
encourage localities and developers to work together on this issue or the GA
will solve the issue once and for all. Goochland’s new proffer policy, which
includes a matrix to determine the specific development impact of each
residential rezoning, was mentioned as a locality that works with existing laws
to address the issue.
While there as no action on reforming the Certificate of Public
Need (COPN) policy that controls construction of health care facilities, the
issue is under study for the 2019 session.
Budesky said that the county is prepared to deal with
fallout, in the short term, should the state be without a budget at the start
of the next fiscal year, July 1. Because
Goochland’s composite index is 80 percent, meaning the county receives 20
percent of education cost from the state, loss of state funding is easier to
bear than counties with lower indexes. He was cautiously optimistic that a
budget will soon in place.
The board ended its afternoon session with a closed meeting
to discuss the performance of the county administrator and county attorney.
No comments:
Post a Comment