The evening portion of the September 3 meeting of the Goochland
Board of Supervisors ended after 1 a.m. Public hearings on its agenda included
rezoning for a possible hotel next to Rt. 288; rezoning for a nine lot
subdivision near Oilville; lease agreements for telecommunications equipment on
the Centerville water tank and a portion of the Central High School Cultural
and Educational Center; a downzoning
from rural preservation to agricultural; and a conditional use permit
(CUP) application to allow River Run Manor on Rt. 6 in Maidens to operate as an event venue.
More than four hours were spent on the last item. After presentations
by staff and the applicant, River Run Manor LLC represented by principal Kim
Moody, a 55-minute public hearing, and more than two hours of discussion among
board members, a vote on the application was deferred until Monday, September
9.
Goochland has a gracious plenty of magnificent estate
properties and mansions. Some are historic; some rural retreats for the affluent,
and some are under construction. As the market for this type of residential property
shrinks, owners, or their heirs, will seek other uses, or perhaps tear them
down and subdivide the land. Objections from neighbors inevitably follow CUP applications
for any event venue. Public hearings and community meetings are emotional and
often confrontational. River Run Manor was no exception.
Partners in River Run Manor, LLC—Kim her husband Andrew
Moody and Tamra and Doug Adams, who operate Virginia Barn Weddings, also in
Maidens—are fine people with good reputations. Way too much time was spent contending
that the Moodys, who also plan to live at River Run Manor, are good small-town
folk. Kim mentioned several times that her relatives are elected officials in
Dinwiddie County, which is very nice, but had no bearing on the matter at hand.
The applicant presentation was not well-organized and made
ill-defined reference to any financial benefits to Goochland. If, indeed, the property
sells for $3 million reported in Richmond Bizsense, about $2.8 million
less than its current assessed valuation according to public record, the county
will lose approximately $14,000 in property tax. Moody was vague about of other
local taxes she might pay on revenue from the six figure weddings she expects
to host at the new venue.
However, the CUP application states that River Run Manor
expects to create 18 jobs the first year; adding 26 in the second year; and 32
in the following year. The application also states that the county will gain substantial
tax revenue when River Run Manor becomes a commercial enterprise rather than a
private residence but did not elaborate. Kim did allude to hefty mortgage
payments and the cost of renovations to bring the property into compliance with
building, fire, and health codes to operate as a place of public assembly,
lodging—it will offer bed and breakfast, and residence.
Continued protestations that the Moodys will be good
neighbors when they run River Run Manor, fell a little flat, when total
prohibition of outdoor amplified music was suggested to assuage neighbor’s
noise concerns. Kim also explained the urgency
of having the CUP approved at the meeting because the closing on the property
was scheduled for the next day and failure to secure the CUP was a deal breaker.
Unfortunate, but not the county’s problem.
A realtor from Sotheby’s, which represented the owners of the
property, heirs to William Massey, who built the estate, reported that during
the five years River Run Manor has been on the market, only entities who planned
commercial, not private, use expressed any interest in the property.
William Massey, Jr. who is one of the current owners,
explained that his father built River Run Manor for entertaining; he had no
idea if there were ever any complaints about noise or traffic. Indeed, many of
the neighbors who opposed the CUP application attended parties there, but they
believe commercial use of the estate is inappropriate for the area.
The caretaker of the property described River Run Manor as a
masterwork and distinctive Goochland landmark.
He supported the event venue to continue the legacy of William Massey,
Sr. and make River Run Manor what it was meant to be all along.
At least one speaker at the River Run Manor meeting promised
legal action if the application was approved. She is a homeowner in the River
Cliff subdivision claiming that River Run Manor is part of the subdivision
whose covenants prohibit the proposed commercial use. County Attorney Tara
McGee explained that restrictive covenants are private agreements between
neighbors, the county does not enforce them; the county makes land use
decisions.
Massey contended that his father separated his land from the
River Cliff subdivision a long time ago and the lot lines were vacated on
plats. Given the amount of money involved, it seems likely that a title search
and routine due diligence would have revealed remaining ties to River Cliff.
Moody said she first heard the allegation at 4:46 p.m. on the afternoon of
September 3.
Objection of neighbors boiled down to hordes
of strangers nearby, traffic, and noise.
Fireworks are prohibited for this kind of use. As an aside,
the fireworks from Hermitage Country Club were clearly audible inside of GOMM
world headquarters in Oilville over the Labor Day weekend, behind closed
windows with a television on. Jonathan Lyle, who lives in the “sweet spot”
between Dover Hall and Hermitage Country Club, was able to recite the play list
from the country club’s weekend festivities, also clearly audible. Concerns expressed by River Cliff residents about
amplified DJ music only several hundred feet from their homes have credence.
One opponent contended that hundreds, if not thousands, of
vehicles would access the property daily and that the required 75 parking spaces
would not accommodate the up to 299 people permitted at events. Kim said that
guests for weddings at venues like River Run Manor typically stay in hotels in
Short Pump—even better those coming to eastern Goochland—and travel to the venue
by motor coach. This reduces the number of vehicles but keeps impaired drivers off
our county roads.
Moody described as the noise made by passing trains as louder
than any sound that might be generated by events. (By the way, the CSX railroad tracks are
private property; walking or otherwise accessing them is trespass and very
dangerous.)
Moody downplayed the outdoor sound issue with a “we’re nice
people, trust us” attitude. She said that most of the amplified music will
happen indoors, where it is easier to contain, because her high-end clients do
not want to deal with bugs and prefer climate-controlled spaces. A harpist, who works with Moody explained that
she often plays with a cello and flute and that need no amplification outdoors. Moody would not agree to a prohibition on amplified
outdoor music, which, she said is needed for cocktail hours between 4 and 6 p.m.
The neighbor whose home is closest to the tennis court—anticipated
as the site of some outdoor activities—said that he expects the new owners to
keep their word, but asked “what if I’m wrong? How often will we need to
complain to you (the county) to make it stop?”
Goochland has a CUP enforcement policy with a mechanism for
revocation after three validated violations of conditions in a twelve-month
period. It is complaint driven, but anonymous complaints will not be accepted.
A neighbor suggested that the term of the initial CUP be one,
rather than the proposed five, years to “see how it goes” and then determine if
it should be extended. Others contended that the application seemed rushed and incomplete.
Indeed, there was a good bit of confusion about how many days events would take
place. The application included a winery and tasting room, which are permitted
by right and can operated 365 days per year. Moody said that they are not ready
for the winery which would be located on the lower level.
After a bit of back and forth, it became clear that the
actual number of wedding and other events would be fewer than one per week,
because it takes a while to set up for elaborate gatherings. Other arcane proposed uses, duck hunting outings for groomsmen, added to
the confusion about what activities would be allowed to take place and how
often.
Around one a.m., John Lumpkins, Jr. District 3 attempted to craft
a motion to approve the CUP with several condition modifications. As his motion became
more complicated—like a verbal representation of a hurricane path “spaghetti” model—County
Administrator John Budesky suggested that the supervisors defer a vote to their
Monday, September 9 meeting. This will allow Lumpkins and McGee to confer and
ensure that all discussed condition modifications are clear. Director
of Community Development Jo Ann Hunter said that the final conditions will be
posted online before September 9 for public review.
Except for amplified outdoor music during late afternoon
cocktail hours, Kim was amenable to most changes. Her focus was on securing the
CUP so the closing could occur. Massey agreed to postpone that until after the
Monday vote.
River Run Manor is an exquisite and unique place, whose highest and best use appears to be as an event venue that will be an asset to the
community. Along with the anticipated associated winery, activities are agritourism, economic development that allows landowners to derive income from their
property. However, neighbors have legitimate
concerns about a commercial establishment preventing the quiet enjoyment of
their homes.
2 comments:
This seems to me another example of a patient board. It was late, after a long day where a lot of important decisions were made and while I think many boards would have forced through a vote this board chose to think outside the box to come to hopefully a great decision. They realized that an opportunity existed for them to pause their response to give staff enough time to fully capture the details and post them for citizens and vote on Monday.
It's interesting to me that important decisions are made when exhaustion is setting in after very long days. Not everyone on the board has the benefit of being retired or independently wealthy and actually work full time and serve. So it's very feasible that critical decisions like a vote at 1am if the board decided to take it would have been after a 17 hour day. I'm not sure That's a recipe for success. But this board paused. I think that's awesome.
Please Excuse the typos I'm writing this at 11:50'pm after the PC Meeting I watched and I'm on my iPad and it's not easy to navigate.
Thanks for the detailed report!
Post a Comment