New fields coming to Benedictine campus |
Land use applications that come before the Goochland Board of Supervisors seem like inside baseball, unless they’re near your property.
The River Road corridor has seen a good bit of residential
growth in the past decades. Many of its residents contend that there are enough
homes along this stretch of scenic byway.
At its October 4 meeting, the supervisors addressed applications
for rezoning land on the south side of River Road adjoining the Benedictine
Schools of Richmond campus, just east of Rt. 288 and conditional use permit to
build athletic facilities on the site. County land records indicate that the school
paid JSC Development, Inc. $3,463,300 for approximately 15 acres on January 6,
2022. The subject parcel is part of Pembroke Farms, a gated residential
enclave.
The land, which formerly encompassed nine lots in Pembroke
Farms, was rezoned from R-1 to A-2. When Benedictine, and recently St.
Gertrude’s School, moved to River Road, the schools continued to use athletic
fields on the northside of Richmond. The
trek to these facilities, appropriately 23 miles from the Goochland campus, is
time consuming and adds to afternoon traffic on River Road.
The new facility will include walking trails, soccer and
softball fields, tennis courts, and additional parking, all of which will be
accessed internally from the Benedictine property with no new “curb cuts” from
River Road, and available for use by Pembroke Farms residents.
An existing home on the property will be used as a guest
house by the school.
Curiously, the fiscal impact of the rezoning was vague.
Before it was sold, the parcel comprised nine lots in Pembroke Farms. County
land records value these lots in the $300k range. The rezoning also voids cash
proffers associated with some of the residential lots.
A relatively simple calculation could determine a ballpark the
value for the eliminated lots as well as the cash proffers that would have been
generated had the lots not been rezoned. As Benedictine seems to be a religious
school, it is probably exempt from local property taxes. Again, calculating the
loss of tax revenue from the nine lots based on their most recent county assessment
would give the supervisors concrete data on which to base their decision. Nine
fewer residential lots, which would typically generate at least 90 vehicle trips
per day, may well be a beneficial trade-off in the area. If students can walk
to the athletic fields from the school, there will be less afternoon traffic on
River Road.
Buffering, screening the fields from River Road, was a
concern. As the subject parcel is higher than the road surface, and existing trees
will not be disturbed to build the fields, the issue seemed moot.
During the public hearing, a resident of James River Estates
asked the board to stop “athletic field creep”. He said that the proposal will
raise the number of school related athletic facilities within one mile of his
home to 42. While students on the Benedictine campus can walk to its fields, busses
from Collegiate and St. Catherine’s are a regular feature of River Road
traffic. He contended that, although when granted its original conditional use
permit about 10 years ago, Benedictine said its students would go only west on
River Road, now they travel east, adding more traffic to the road. He also said
public address systems on existing fields are clearly audible at his home.
Benedictine said they are putting in new systems that will face west to reduce
this noise.
Pembroke Farms residents support the land use change according
to Stephan Cometas, whose home is the closest to the subject parcels.
Illuminating the proposed tennis courts, which will be
available for use by Pembroke Farms residents, was a point of contention among
the supervisors. Lighting of fields is prohibited on the Benedictine campus, and
nearby facilities owned by Collegiate and St. Catherine’s schools.
Susan Lascolette, District 1 contended that allowing these tennis
courts to be lit is inconsistent with county policy about athletic fields in
the River Road corridor. Others pointed out that only dark sky lighting provisions
apply to tennis courts on private homes and country clubs. As the tennis courts
are at the south end of the subject property, it is unlikely their lights would
be visible from River Road. The court lights, will conform to the dark sky
policy and be turned off no later than 10 p.m.
The board voted 3-1, with Lascolette in dissent, to approve
the application.
No comments:
Post a Comment