Man plans, God laughs.
For most of the 21st century replacing the
current Goochland Elementary School has been on the “to do” list for our school
division. The great recession pushed this task, after a good deal of money was spent
on attempt to renovate the existing school or design a new one to the back
burner.
When the “new broom” school board swept into office in 2011,
replacing GES was on its radar screen, but far down the priority list as it dealt
with more pressing issues.
Meanwhile as the county, which funds schools, grappled with
the fiscal threat posed by the Tuckahoe Creek Service District debt, which
could have bankrupted Goochland, debt threshold policies were established.
At least two years ago, when the economy and county finances
were on sounder footing, the new GES project finally got underway. Using land already
owned by the school division, on the west side of Bulldog Way near its
intersection with Steeplechase Parkway, a design for the school began to take
shape. This is part of the 104-acre parcel purchased by the school division in
1998 for $450,000.
Schools of tomorrow—the new GES is expected to serve the
community for decades—are a far cry from the schools of yesteryear where
students sat in neat rows listening to teachers at the front of the room.
An initial design, crafted with input from the community and
students was lovely. It followed the hilly contours of the site and had lots of
windows. It was also very expensive. When cost estimates on that version came
in, the supervisors suggested that schools go back to the drawing board for a lower
cost alternative. The result was a simpler structure comprised of two rectangles.
(See https://www.goochlandschools.org/page/new-ges-construction-project
for details.) The capacity of the new school will be 700 students, 650 k-5 and
50 pre k. It is expected to open at the start of the 2024-25 school year.
Attendance boundary adjustments will pull students from both
Byrd and Randolph, removing trailers from those schools.
A cost that remained constant through design changes was work
needed to prepare the site for construction, including extension of utilities. Schools
contended that other potential locations for the new school had been considered
but were rejected.
As of last summer, the schools spent $3,026,200 million on
design and other preliminaries for GES, but actual costs remained a best
guesstimate. Plans were put out to bid
earlier this year and opened on November 17.
One of the many things that sets Goochland County apart from
other jurisdictions in Virginia is the cordial, collaborative relations between
the supervisors and school board that followed the clean sweep election. Both
elected bodies recognized that working in concert, instead of at cross purposes,
benefits the community on many levels.
The support of the supervisors helped our schools attain new
heights of achievement to enrich our students. However, as clouds darken on the
fiscal horizon, this relationship could be strained. At a joint workshop held
on November 29, schools presented results of the bids, which are good for 60
days, to the supervisors and discussed funding for the project.
Thanks to inflation, supply chain issues, and labor
shortages, the total project cost using the lowest bid, is $56,075.904, 31.5
percent above the November 2021 estimate. Adding in interior secondary complex
renovations, including fine arts spaces and reducing funding for CTE additions,
brings the total to $65,833.680. This number does not include funding for an
auxiliary gym and wrestling room and $17.9 million for the CTE addition that
were part of initial estimates. It also removes approximately $500 k for a
playground.
Last year, Goochland voters approved via referendum issuance
of up to $60 million in bonds for education capital expenses and up to $36
million for public safety capital projects. In February, the county sold $50
million in bonds—$41.8 for schools, the remainder for a new fire-rescue station—
before rates went up. The county did not issue the entire $96 million, because bond
proceeds must be used in certain time frame.
It is unclear if proceeds from the $50 million issue were
earmarked for either schools or public safety.
Schools sharpened pencils and presented a funding strategy to
the supervisors using bond proceeds; interest on those proceeds which is
accruing at about $100k monthly; a $5 million bond premium; cash proffers; and
cash from a prior capital improvement plan turnback with a delta—difference between
money needed and available—of $ 8,442,224.
Goochland, said Schools’ Finance Director Debbie White, does
not qualify state education construction money, because we are “too well
managed.”
The supervisors, who take their role as stewards of taxpayer
dollars very seriously, discussed where the delta might come from.
Bond guru Ken Peterson District 5 said that given current
high interest rates, there would be little interest in a small county bond
issue. Other options to find the delta were discussed. Timing of financing, the
project will be paid for in increments, the last coming after the end of
construction in 2025, was also discussed. The county audit committee will meet
on December 6, this matter will undoubtedly be on its agenda.
There are a lot of moving pieces to this issue. Postponing
construction could result in even higher bids. Should the new GES not open in
2024, school board members contended, the old building would need some costly
upgrades to welcome students.
The school board met right after the workshop. It began with
a moment of silence in honor the service of former district 5 school board
member Max Cisne, who passed away on November 19.
After discussion, the school board voted to approve a letter to the supervisors requesting the funding delta.
5 comments:
Sandie,
Great reporting - and thanks for being there.
A truly stunning meeting...
Build the school the right way and don’t cut corners. If you are going to cut corners then don’t build new. take the money and remodel all 3 and move on. Kick the can down the road and costs will continue to rise.
Why is GCPS hellbent on building on this parcel? Has GCPS really looked at other options, or only options that GCPS desires?
What about building completely new structures on land where schools already exist, and once opened, razing the old structures, like we are seeing being done in Henrico? Asking the question, since selling the 104-acre parcel itself would net $2.5 million (104 acres @ $30K/acre = $3 million, less $450K purchase price in 1998).
Surely GCPS and the BOS is aware of how the agile process works. There must be an MVP (minimal viable product) that costs less than $65 million!
Just one small nitpick:
$450,000 in 1998 is worth $822,732.52 today
https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/1998?amount=450000
We have a state of the art animal shelter but dilapidated schools and a lack of fire stations. Where are our priorities Goochland?!
Post a Comment