Wednesday, May 27, 2026

TOD pretrial motions

 

Goochland County, represented by Michael J. Finney, Esq. of the Gentry Locke Law firm, faced off against Phillip Strother, Esq. of Strother Law Offices, PLC representing the plaintiff, county residents opposing the Technology Overlay District (TOD) created by Goochland Supervisors last November, before the Hon. Timothy K. Sanner in Circuit Court on May 26 for pretrial  motions. The lawsuit was filed on December 4, 2025.

The plaintiff contends that the Goochland Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission failed to comply with Virginia statutory law and constitutional principles in the approval of the TOD, which, it contends, also conflicted with county zoning ordinances.

Since the suit was filed last December, the plaintiff has nonsuited—removed from the complaint—Count VIII, which said that approval of the TOD constituted unreasonable, arbitrary, and capricious rezoning in violation of Virginia law.

The complaint asks the Court to declare the TOD and related amendments to county zoning ordinances, regulations, and comprehensive land use plan, null and void.

During the pretrial motions, Finney asked the Court to admit 8,500 pages of documents and other exhibits relating to the process of TOD approval to support Goochland’s case. Strother argued that the volume of material that Goochland presented for inclusion in the case was excessive. He cited a Virgina Mercury article dated weeks after the November 6 TOD approval included on the 8,500 pages, as an item irrelevant to the case.

Finney contended that without a clearer picture of the plaintiff’s case, the County cannot determine which of the documents and exhibits are essential to its defense. The Judge denied the County’s request to have all the initial documentation material admitted but allowed the county to return with a revised set of documents sometime in the summer after it has had the opportunity to review the plaintiff’s case. A demurrer, the next step in the legal process, on the suit, is scheduled to be heard in Circuit Court on October 20.

No comments: