Goochland supervisors faced a full agenda on August 1 after starting at 7 pm. to allow the board to attend National Night Out.
The board considered adding an ordinance to the section on
taxation in the county code.
County Attorney Tara McGee explained that she has been
working with offices of the Assessor and Commissioner of the Revenue for the
past two years to understand the source of tax exemptions for real and personal
property in Goochland. She said that non-profit organizations classified by the
IRS as “501 (c) (3)” are exempt from income tax, but not automatically from other
taxes levied at the state and local level.
Only certain entities can be exempt from real and personal
property taxes in Virginia, McGee said. The Constitution of the Commonwealth
exempts churches, schools, and non-profit cemeteries as tax exempt. Over the years,
the General Assembly, she said, identified other categories that it believes come
under the “religious, charitable, and beneficial” umbrella and granted a
thousand individual tax exemption designations. These include Goochland Cares
and the Goochland Volunteer Fire-Rescue Association, which owns five county
fire-rescue stations.
The other caveat for the exemption under Virgina law is that
the property must be actively and exclusively in use for the stated non-profit
purpose. The goal of the ordinance is to ensure that all real property and
vehicles owned by non-profit entities is used to fulfill the mission of the
organization and not generate otherwise taxable revenue.
The proposed ordinance requires entities eligible under
state law for tax exemptions for real and personal property to file an
application including documents and information to support those tax
exemptions. Application renewals would be filed every three years. The first filing
deadline, should the ordinance be approved, will be December 31, 2023.
The process would be similar to establishing eligibility for
land use taxation or the elderly and disabled tax exemption. The ordinance will
demonstrate to the taxpayers that exempt entities are entitled to their relief
and that local government is being good stewards of public funds, McGee said.
The proposed ordinance applies only to non-profits who own
real estate or garage vehicles in Goochland County. Non-compliance could result
in loss of tax-exempt status. Both the assessor and Commissioner of the Revenue
will work with entities covered by the ordinance to help with compliance
The Goochland Assessor, said McGee, has accounts for 74
non-profit entities with real estate valued at $248 million that has not been
taxed. The Commissioner of the Revenue has accounts for 45 tax exempt entities,
some of which may be on the assessor’s list, which have vehicles valued at $912k
that have been carried as tax exempt.
Following a meeting held earlier this year on the matter,
the compliance application has been whittled down from eight pages to two.
During the public hearing, however, a representative of
Dover Baptist Church objected to the requirement that by-laws be submitted as
part of the compliance process because by-laws of religious organizations could
include a statement of faith that could give local government the power to deny
tax exempt status to a church if the views of the government are in conflict with
that of the religious organization.
“The framers of our constitution were acutely aware how governments
in Europe had sought to control and manipulate religious practices in churches.
They resolved that America be different. Bureaucratic efforts to subject
religious beliefs to verification have no place in a free country,” the Dover representative
said.
McGee said that if by-laws are not publicly published, a church
could instead make a certifying statement to comply with the ordinance.
The supervisors wanted to see the form used to certify exemptions
and asked McGee to include a simple appeal process in the ordinance should an
entity be refused tax exempt status. They voted to defer a decision on the
matter until their September 5 meeting, at which time another public hearing
will be held on the revised ordinance.
3 comments:
It is interesting that Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3605 says "may require..." I wonder why the need all of the sudden? Initially at least, I find I am in agreement with the representative of Dover Baptist Church.
I would like to see an example of this:
"....a representative of Dover Baptist Church objected to the requirement that by-laws be submitted as part of the compliance process because by-laws of religious organizations could include a statement of faith that could give local government the power to deny tax exempt status to a church if the views of the government are in conflict with that of the religious organization."
The government can't favor any religion over another, or none, so how would something like this arise? What are they doing there at Dover Baptist Church? Advocating for the overthrow of the government and replacing it with a theocracy? Even so, I don't think they could be denied tax exempt status (though the government would certainly be derelict in their duty if they didn't keep a close eye on such an organization). Or does the statement of faith advocate shunning and discriminating against those who have federally supported civil rights? I think they would still have the right to advocate for that, despite how heinous and un-Jesus like that would be.
Note that The Satanic Temple is a federally recognized, tax exempt religion, despite the fact that TST doesn't actually worship or believe in Satan! If they can get tax exempt status, what is Dover worried about? I don't see a statement of faith on their website, which is unusual for a church.
Is it safe to assume that any extra revenue that comes into county coffers from the enforcement of this ordinance more than offsets the costs of existing (or additional?) county staff overseeing these filings and making appropriate enforcement recommendations?
Post a Comment