| People came to Goochland from all over Virginia for DMV Select Services in the Covid summer of 2020 |
In Virginia, localities like Goochland County must operate with balanced budgets—expenses must equal revenue. Crafting a balanced budget, even for a relatively small county, is a complicated task.
During a budget work session held on the evening of January
20, County Administrator Dr. Jeremy Raley, Ed. D., and the board of supervisors
delved into complexities of the budget process. (Thanks to the excellent work
of Dan Stowers and the information technology department, the meeting was
recorded and is archived at https://goochlandva.new.swagit.com/videos/372758.)
For the first time in recent memory, county administration discussed
funding mechanisms and revenue streams in a public setting. This is another
example of Raley’s pledge to improve transparency.
Goochland, Raley explained, assesses property and sets tax
rates on a calendar year basis, but budgets on a fiscal year that runs from
July 1 to June 30. Real estate and personal property taxes are collected in
June and December, in two different fiscal years. He characterized the budget
as a “spending plan”. The budget process has been ongoing for many months, he
said, when all departments and agencies share their needs. He thanked Treasurer
Pam Duncan, Assessor Mary Anne Davis, and interim finance director Dave Wilson
for their collaboration in the process.
He gave a special shout out to Commissioner of the Revenue Jennnifer
Brown and her staff. Not only does this office provide excellent service to Goochland
citizens, but to anyone who needs DMV services. Indeed, during the Covid shut
down, Goochland DMV Select, which is part of Brown’s office, was one of the few
in the Commonwealth that remained open serving all comers. DMV select processes
“a significant number of transactions” which generates reimbursement from the Department
of Motor Vehicles, more than $400k in FY25.
As 2026 dawned the focus shifted to identifying revenue
streams to use taxpayer dollars and make good decisions to carry out strategic
goals and initiatives.
The budget for FY27, which begins next July 1, looks 18
months ahead to forecast available revenue to pay county bills.
The Goochland Assessor’s Office values residential and commercial
property. Its “heavy lift” is done from July through December including in
person visits to properties, looking at sales and a variety of factors to determine,
as closely as possible, fair market value. Calendar year 2026 assessments were
mailed on January 15. These will be used to calculate property taxes after tax
rates are set by the supervisors in April. First half tax bills are mailed in May
and due on June 5.
Those taxes will be collected in the current fiscal year, whose
budget was approved in April 2025. Taxes generated by personal property,
machines, and tools are a significant revenue stream. The Commissioner of the Revenue
determines the value of those assets in the county as of January 1. That is the
number used in crafting the budget for the next fiscal year. However, said Raley,
this amount fluctuates throughout the year as vehicles move in and out of the
county. Those values are updated on the 15th of every month. The
constant churn complicates forecasting the amount of that revenue stream.
Raley said that a three percent increase in real estate values
on January 2026 was used in the FY26 budget, which translated into an estimated
tax revenue of $52.4 million. Revenue collected
as of December 31, 2025, the first half of FY26 was $23,870,490. Projected
collections by June 30, 2026, using those same numbers are $26,942,913 for a
total of $50,813, 403, a shortfall of $1,586, 597. However, the actual increase
in January 2026 property values was $10.3 billion, eight percent more than projected.
Using the 53-cent tax rate this translates into $54.4 million for the FY27
budget. For the first half of 2026, this is estimated at $27,734,705, for an FY
26 total of $54,402,690.
The assessor’s team, said Raley, is predicting an increase next
year of at least four percent. However, unknown factors, including an economic
slowdown, could reduce that. He said that projects under construction are added
to the tax rolls when certificates of occupancy are issued. For calendar 2026,
this could include the Honda dealership on Broad Street Road and other
commercial projects, which could significantly increase actual collections. Without
a crystal ball, forecasting can be complicated and frustrating.
As much of the rise in assessed valuations is driven by new construction
in the Tuckahoe Creek Service District, it was pointed out that, in addition to
paying a 32 cent per $100 ad valorem tax, 55 percent of tax increase on
properties there also goes to service the debt that created the district in
2002. All real estate tax collected from land outside the TCSD goes to the county
general fund.
Tom Winfree District 3 said “basically the county is forking
over 55 percent of the normal real estate taxes collected on the properties in
the TCSD. TCSD keeps all the ad valorem tax and 55 percent of the 53 cents per
100 that we collect so we can keep 45 percent for general services. We’re not keeping
the full 53 cents. The rest of the taxpayers are not benefitting as much. If
you look at it another way, the citizens in the TCSD are only taking up 45
percent of their weight in the general running of the county because the rest
of it is going to pay off the bonds.”
Wilson said that the 55 percent TCSD revenue sharing is treated
as a negative and subtracted from projected totals.
County Attorney Tara McGee said that the arrangement is not
a policy decision made by this board but was pledged by the bond documents in
2002 in order to get the bonds approved. It is a pledge of revenue to support
the issuance of the bonds and cannot be rescinded.
“We get asked the
question why can’t we make adjustments to the ad valorem tax and change it on
specific case situations, but when it goes into an indenture, the life of that
indenture, because bonds are sold to institutions, to other places outside of
Goochland County, we can’t go changing any of those rules. They are in a
contract as any other bond. I know it is a point of frustration for a lot of people;
this goes back 20 years. This is a bond issuance that we can’t unlock or amend,
which is why we want to pay it down sooner than later,” said Charlie Vaughters,
District 4.
Pencils will be sharpened in coming months to build a FY27
budget. Stay tuned.
1 comment:
One thing the county should look at is implementing a 4% meals tax. A number of surrounding communities already have this in place (e.g. Henrico, Louisa, Richmond), and while it may not seem too consequential given the population of the county as well the small number of restaurants, meals sold to employees on the Capital One campus alone could generate $150,000 in extra revenue with the introduction of a meals tax.
Post a Comment